These may not be exhaustive, though we think they are. Then, when there is understanding, the criticisms are specific and fall within the four categories above. Notice that Adler and Van Doren’s first emphasis is on understanding the other position before launching into criticisms. “You are illogical – your reasoning is not cogent”.After he has said, “I understand but I disagree,” he can make the following remarks to the author: The four points can be briefly summarized by conceiving the reader as conversing with the author, as talking back. The authors mention, “four ways in which a book can be adversely criticized.” And their hope is that, “if a reader confines himself to making these points, he will be less likely to indulge in expressions of emotion or prejudice.” These four points apply beyond just reading. ![]() There is one particular section that stands out for those who are seeking to become good critical readers, as well as good critical thinkers. ![]() Adler and Charles Van Doren, in their classic book How to Read a Book (p.156-161), discuss the topic of agreeing or disagreeing with an author.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |